UK construction-safety guidance by the Riskora Editorial Team
Producing a proper risk assessment for cladding installation is not optional — it is a legal and practical requirement for construction work in the UK. Whether you are a sole trader or managing a multi-phase project, documented risk management protects your workers, satisfies clients, and keeps you on the right side of HSE enforcement.
Example Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment for Cladding Installation
No card required · 1 lifetime safety document · Upgrade when you need more
The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 require employers to carry out a suitable and sufficient risk assessment for cladding installation before operations start. Self-employed workers carrying out construction activities must also comply.
A construction contractor in UK needs to produce a risk assessment for cladding installation before starting work next week. The client has requested professional documentation as a condition of site access. Using Riskora, they select the relevant trade preset, review pre-populated hazards, adjust controls for their specific site, and generate a professional risk assessment in under 5 minutes — ready for review and sign-off.
The Work at Height Regulations 2005 govern the installation, with regulation 9 applying wherever the substrate is fragile. For buildings in scope of the Building Safety Act 2022, the golden thread of information means the assessment and method statement form part of the record for the building, and material and installation decisions must be traceable — which raises the standard of what is expected in writing.
Work at Height Regulations 2005 · SI 2005/735
HSE
CDM Regulations 2015 · SI 2015/51
HSE
Building Safety Act 2022 (higher-risk buildings)
BSR
Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 · SI 1998/2307
HSE
Cladding sits at the intersection of two regimes that reviewers now check together: the work-at-height risk during installation, and the fire performance of what is being installed. Since the Building Safety Act 2022, documentation for a higher-risk building is read by people who will also ask what the product is and how the partially completed façade behaves in a fire — a question a generic work-at-height assessment does not answer.
| Hazard | Control measure |
|---|---|
| Falls from mast climbers, MEWPs or the leading edge of the cladding line | Mast climbing work platform or MEWP selected against the elevation and inspected before use, harness with restraint lanyard in every boom-type MEWP, and edge protection maintained at every unclad opening. |
| Wind catching panels during lifting and positioning | Stated stop-work wind speed for panel handling, panels never released from the lifting equipment until mechanically fixed, and vacuum lifters or purpose-made clamps rather than manual control of large sheets. |
| Falling panels, fixings and offcuts to the public or trades below | Full-height exclusion zone with barriers and marshals, netting or fans to the scaffold, tool tethering, and no work over an occupied entrance without a protected route. |
| Fragile surfaces and openings in the substrate during over-cladding | All rooflights and existing sheets treated as fragile, openings covered or barriered as soon as they are formed, and no reliance on the existing sheet to carry a person. |
| Hot works and combustible insulation during installation | Hot work permit with a 60-minute fire watch, combustible insulation kept in a controlled quantity at the working face, and the fire strategy for the partially completed façade agreed with the principal contractor. |
| Manual handling of long, awkward panels and rails | Mechanical lifting as the default with vacuum lifters for large panels, two-person handling only within assessed limits, and cut-to-size ordering to reduce site cutting and handling. |
Panel handling normally stops well below the MEWP limit because a large panel acts as a sail — many contractors set 17 mph for panel handling against a MEWP limit of around 28 mph. State the figure, who measures it and where it is recorded, rather than writing 'in high winds'.
For higher-risk buildings, yes. The golden thread requires the information behind design and installation decisions to be recorded and kept, so the risk assessment and method statement become part of the building's record rather than a job-file document discarded at practical completion.
The contractor doing the work, coordinated through the principal contractor. Because the zone usually affects the public or an occupied entrance, the assessment should name the barrier line, the marshals and the protected route rather than leaving it to be arranged on the day.
Select your trade, pick your hazards, and generate a structured document — no training required.
Create a cladding risk assessment freeNo card required · 1 lifetime safety document · Paid tiers add branding, sign-off and audit trails
Or learn more about the platform: See plans and one-off options →
All documents should be reviewed by a competent person before use on site.
Generate a preview first. Sign up only when you want to save, edit or export.
Final RAMS must be reviewed and approved by a competent person before use.
Riskora is an assistive document preparation tool. All documents generated must be reviewed, verified, and approved by a competent person before use on site. Riskora does not replace professional safety judgment, and no output should be treated as a legal compliance guarantee.