Method Statement for Scaffold Erection — UK

UK construction-safety guidance by the Riskora Editorial Team

Scaffold erection is skilled, high-risk work that requires a clear, step-by-step method statement. Falls during erection, structural failure from incorrect assembly, and dropped objects are constant hazards. If you are providing scaffolding services on a UK construction project, your method statement must demonstrate competence, planning, and NASC compliance.

Under 5 minutesNo training requiredPDF downloadBuilt for UK contractors

Example Method Statement

Method Statement for Scaffold Erection — UK

  • Scaffold specification and design (TG20 or bespoke design)
  • Ground conditions and base preparation requirements
  • Erection sequence: base lift, standard lifts, loading bays, access provisions
  • Tie pattern, spacing, and anchor point details
Create a scaffolding erection method statement free

No card required · 1 lifetime safety document · Upgrade when you need more

When This Document Is Required

Under CDM 2015 and the Work at Height Regulations 2005, scaffold erection requires a written method statement describing the safe sequence of operations. NASC guidance (SG4:15) provides the industry standard for scaffold erection procedures. Principal contractors on commercial projects will require a method statement as part of the pre-start documentation. The method statement must be specific to the scaffold configuration, site conditions, and loading requirements.

What Must Be Included

  • Scaffold specification and design (TG20 or bespoke design)
  • Ground conditions and base preparation requirements
  • Erection sequence: base lift, standard lifts, loading bays, access provisions
  • Tie pattern, spacing, and anchor point details
  • Advance guardrail system or alternative fall protection during erection
  • Bracing requirements and structural stability during erection
  • Boarding, toe boards, and guardrail installation
  • Handover inspection and scaffold tagging procedures
  • Loading class and permitted use restrictions
  • Dismantling sequence (reverse of erection with fall protection maintained)

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Not verifying ground bearing capacity before erecting the first standard
  • Omitting advance guardrails — forcing scaffolders to work unprotected at each lift
  • Failing to install ties at the correct frequency and pattern
  • Not producing TG20 compliance sheets for standard configurations
  • Handing over scaffold without a formal inspection record
  • Not specifying dismantling procedures (often more dangerous than erection)

Example Scenario

A scaffolding company in Glasgow is erecting a 20-metre high independent tied scaffold on a city-centre commercial building. The scaffold will support multiple trades over a six-month refurbishment programme. The principal contractor requires a method statement covering erection, use, adaptation, and eventual dismantling. Using Riskora, the scaffold contracts manager generates a comprehensive method statement in minutes — covering SG4 compliance, tie patterns, advance guardrails, and handover procedures.

Create Your Method Statement in Minutes

Select your trade, pick your hazards, and generate a structured document — no training required.

Create a scaffolding erection method statement free

No card required · 1 lifetime safety document · Paid tiers add branding, sign-off and audit trails

Or learn more about the platform: See plans and one-off options →

Built for real job scenarios · Designed for UK contractors and competent-person review

All documents should be reviewed by a competent person before use on site.

Free safety-document builder

Create a scaffolding erection method statement free — preview before sign-up

Generate a preview first. Sign up only when you want to save, edit or export.

Final RAMS must be reviewed and approved by a competent person before use.

Riskora is an assistive document preparation tool. All documents generated must be reviewed, verified, and approved by a competent person before use on site. Riskora does not replace professional safety judgment, and no output should be treated as a legal compliance guarantee.