Honest comparison of Riskora and RAMS-App for UK risk assessment and method statement generation. Pricing, speed, governance, document QA and best-fit teams compared head to head.
Frequently asked questions
- Is Riskora a RAMS-App alternative?
- Yes. Riskora produces the same RAMS output that RAMS-App does, plus method statements, COSHH, site inductions, toolbox talks and a training register from the same subscription — and adds governance features (RBAC, version locking, audit download packs, compliance calendar, document QA) that RAMS-App doesn't offer.
- How much does RAMS-App cost vs Riskora?
- RAMS-App's paid plans are priced per user per month (~£15/user/mo at the time of writing); the bill scales with every team member. Riskora is flat at £29/mo on Starter and £69/mo on Pro with no per-user fees — for any team of two or more, Riskora is meaningfully cheaper.
- Can I switch from RAMS-App to Riskora?
- There's no automated import, but you can recreate a typical RAMS in Riskora in under 10 minutes using the trade preset and pre-loaded hazard library. Most users on the free wizard recreate one of their existing RAMS-App documents to compare output quality side by side.
- Does Riskora work on a phone?
- Yes. Riskora is a progressive web app — install it to your iOS or Android home screen and it behaves like a native app with full feature parity to desktop. You can produce a complete RAMS from a phone in under 5 minutes.
- Which tool is better for a sole trader?
- Honestly, if you're a sole trader producing one RAMS a month and you never need a method statement, COSHH section or training register, RAMS-App's free tier may be enough. The moment you add a colleague, need an induction, need a toolbox talk, or want a QA engine to catch weak content before a PC review, Riskora's flat-rate subscription is the better economics.