Riskora vs HandsHQ — RAMS Software Comparison (2026)

Honest comparison of Riskora and HandsHQ for UK RAMS, risk assessment and method statement generation. Pricing, speed, training and best-fit teams.

Frequently asked questions

Is Riskora a HandsHQ alternative?
Yes, for the RAMS-builder portion of HandsHQ. Riskora does not replace the training-records, competence-tracking or site-induction sign-on functionality. If you only need RAMS, Riskora is a far cheaper, faster alternative. If you need the full platform, HandsHQ is the right tool.
Can I migrate my HandsHQ documents to Riskora?
There is no automated migration — but you can recreate any HandsHQ RAMS in Riskora in under 10 minutes per document because the builder is prompt-based rather than blank-template-based. Most users on the trial recreate one or two of their typical RAMS to compare.
How much does HandsHQ cost compared to Riskora?
HandsHQ pricing is on application but typically starts around £100/mo and scales with seats. Riskora is £29/mo on the Starter plan (20 documents) and £69/mo on Pro (200 documents), with Team, Business and Enterprise tiers above that.
Does Riskora handle CDM 2015 and rail RAMS?
Yes for general CDM 2015 work. Rail RAMS often have additional sponsor/principal contractor requirements (e.g. Network Rail templates) — Riskora generates the underlying RAMS structure but you may need to manually map the output into a Network Rail-required format if working trackside.