Build your free safety document now
RAMS guide · United Kingdom · Updated May 2026

Excavation RAMS — UK contractor guide

Excavation work in the UK is governed by CDM 2015, the Construction (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1996 (where they still bite — most provisions are now in CDM), and a body of HSE guidance led by HSG47 (Avoiding danger from underground services) and HSG150 (Health and safety in construction). The dominant hazards are service strike, trench collapse and contaminated ground. A strong excavation RAMS treats each as a named topic with its own controls, not as a single line in a hazard list.

Service strike — the leading cause of excavation injury

Service strikes — gas, electric, water, telecoms — cause the largest single share of excavation injuries in the UK. HSG47 (3rd edition) sets out the SLOC method: Survey, Locate, Observe, Care. The RAMS must show evidence of each step: the desktop service-records search (LSBUD or equivalent), the CAT scan results with serial number of the instrument and date, the digging-method controls (hand-dig within 500mm of any service, no power tools within 300mm of any electrical service), and the supervisor's authority to stop work on any unexpected finding.

The LSBUD (LinesearchbeforeUdig) free service covers most national infrastructure. Local utilities (DNOs, water companies, fibre operators) must be searched separately — the RAMS should name the providers searched and the reference numbers of the responses.

Trench support — the section that determines lifesaving

HSE statistics show that trench collapse fatalities are almost always in excavations between 1.2m and 3m deep — the range where contractors are most tempted to skip support. The RAMS must specify the support method for any excavation over 1.2m: battering to a safe angle (typically 1:1 in firm ground, flatter in unstable ground), shoring (timber, hydraulic or proprietary), or a trench box. Generic 'support as required' wording is the most common single reason an excavation RAMS gets sent back.

For any excavation in unstable, made or saturated ground, the support specification should be signed off by a temporary works coordinator (TWC) — this is the BS 5975 standard the industry has converged on. The TWC's name and registration should appear in the RAMS.

Contaminated and made ground

Much of the urban UK sits on made ground — historical landfill, demolition rubble, former industrial sites. The RAMS should reference the Phase 1 desktop study and Phase 2 intrusive investigation (if available), name the contaminants of concern (typically hydrocarbons, heavy metals, asbestos in demolition fill), and set out the controls during dig (PPE category, decontamination, segregation of arisings). For sites within 250m of a former gasworks, brownfield register entry or historical industrial use, contaminated ground should be assumed until proven otherwise.

For sites with a confirmed asbestos-in-soil risk, CAR 2012 applies — the RAMS should describe how arisings will be sampled, segregated and disposed of, and whether removal is licensed or non-licensed work.

Confined space and water — the late-stage risks

Once an excavation exceeds 1.2m depth or accumulates standing water, the Confined Spaces Regulations 1997 (SI 1997/1713) may apply — particularly where there is biological or chemical hazard (sewer connections, gas migration from made ground). The RAMS should set out the entry procedure: atmospheric monitoring (oxygen, LEL, H2S, CO), continuous attendance at the surface, rescue equipment on standby and a named emergency procedure that does not depend on fire-and-rescue arrival times.

For any excavation where standing water cannot be managed by pump alone, the RAMS should reference the rescue plan for a casualty in water and the buoyancy aids on site.

Hazards specific to excavation

Each hazard paired with the UK regulation or HSE guidance document that applies.

  • Strike on buried gas, electric, water or telecoms service

    HSG47 + EAWR 1989

  • Trench collapse and fall-in

    CDM 2015 + HSG150

  • Falls into open excavations

    WAHR 2005 + CDM 2015

  • Contaminated or made ground exposure

    COSHH 2002 + CAR 2012

  • Plant stability near excavation edges

    CDM 2015 + Site Code of Practice

  • Confined-space entry below 1.2m with biological / chemical hazard

    CSR 1997 + L101

  • Drowning in flooded excavation

    CDM 2015

Most common rejection reasons

Patterns we see when principal contractors send excavation RAMS back for re-work.

  1. Trench support specified as 'as required' rather than naming the method (batter, shore, box) and the depth threshold.
  2. No LSBUD reference, DNO search reference or CAT scan record for service location.
  3. Contaminated-ground risk not addressed in known brownfield areas.
  4. No named temporary works coordinator for excavations beyond 1.2m in unstable ground.
  5. Plant traffic management plan missing — most excavation fatalities involve plant-pedestrian interactions.

What a compliant excavation RAMS must include

  • Pre-start service location: LSBUD reference, DNO search, CAT scan with instrument serial
  • Digging method controls (hand-dig within 500mm of services)
  • Trench support method named for every excavation depth band
  • Temporary works coordinator name (BS 5975) where applicable
  • Contaminated-ground assessment and controls
  • Plant traffic management plan
  • Edge protection and access (ladder secured, ramp angle, etc.)
  • Emergency arrangements for service strike, collapse and water ingress
  • Sign-off block

Relevant regulations and HSE guidance

The legal framework a excavation RAMS operates inside — all links point to the official source.

Excavation RAMS — frequently asked questions

Do I need to support a trench under 1.2m deep?

Not automatically, but you must risk-assess it. The 1.2m threshold is industry convention, not a statutory line — CDM 2015 reg 22 requires support where any person could be at risk, regardless of depth. In made ground, saturated ground or near a structure, support may be required at 600mm or less. The RAMS should name the threshold for the specific ground conditions, not default to 1.2m.

What is LSBUD and is it mandatory?

LSBUD (LinesearchbeforeUdig) is a free online service that returns the records of most UK national infrastructure operators within minutes. It is not mandatory by law, but using it (or an equivalent multi-utility search) is the de-facto evidence that the contractor has discharged the SLOC duty under HSG47. The RAMS should reference the LSBUD search reference number.

What's the difference between battering, shoring and a trench box?

Battering means cutting the sides of the excavation back to a stable angle — typically 1:1 in firm ground, flatter in unstable ground. Shoring means installing supports (timber, hydraulic struts, sheet piles) against the excavation walls. A trench box is a proprietary steel cage lowered into the excavation that protects operatives inside it without supporting the walls themselves. The right choice depends on ground conditions, the work being done, and the proximity of structures.

Who is the temporary works coordinator and when do I need one?

The TWC is the named competent person under BS 5975 who takes responsibility for the design, installation, monitoring and removal of temporary works on a project. For most excavation work over 1.2m in unstable ground, or for any complex temporary works (sheet piling, ground anchors, cofferdams), a TWC is the industry-standard expectation and many principal contractors require one in the RAMS.

What do I do if I uncover an unexpected service mid-dig?

Stop work immediately, withdraw operatives, and re-survey. The RAMS should give the supervisor explicit authority to stop work without referring upwards and should set out the protocol: protect the service in place, contact the utility's emergency line, and do not resume until the find is logged and the support method or route is re-assessed. Unexpected finds are common — the document should treat them as a planned-for event, not an emergency.

Excavation RAMS by UK city

City-specific local context — council, HSE office and local building stock notes — for excavation contractors.

Local context for excavation work in other UK cities

Riskora prompts for the council permits, building stock and access constraints that apply wherever the job is — these are the excavation details principal contractors check first in each city.

Excavation RAMS in London · Greater London
Dense Victorian and Georgian terrace stock, listed-building prevalence in central boroughs, deep basements driven by floor-area constraints, and a high proportion of refurbishment-over-new-build. London ground conditions vary sharply between London Clay (most of the centre and north), gravel terraces along the Thames, and chalk in outer south-east boroughs. Permits and conditions run through London borough councils (building control varies by borough). All RAMS guides for London
Excavation RAMS in Manchester · Greater Manchester
A mix of 19th-century mill conversions, Victorian terraces, post-war stock and modern apartment towers. Mill conversions in particular create unusual structural and access constraints, often combined with cast-iron or brick-arch floor structures that require specific lifting and load assessments. Permits and conditions run through Manchester City Council Building Control. All RAMS guides for Manchester
Excavation RAMS in Birmingham · West Midlands
Significant interwar and post-war stock, large industrial and warehouse buildings around the Jewellery Quarter and Digbeth, and a heavy current refurbishment programme in the city core. Ground conditions vary between Mercia Mudstone in the centre and glacial sands and gravels in outer areas. Permits and conditions run through Birmingham City Council Planning & Building Control. All RAMS guides for Birmingham
Excavation RAMS in Leeds · West Yorkshire
Heavy Victorian commercial stock, Yorkshire stone construction with specific stone-cleaning and lime-mortar considerations, large 1960s/70s office towers undergoing refurbishment, and modern build-to-rent towers concentrated south of the river. Permits and conditions run through Leeds City Council Building Control. All RAMS guides for Leeds
Excavation RAMS in Glasgow · Greater Glasgow
Iconic Glasgow tenement stock — sandstone, four storeys, common closes — with associated party-wall, common-stair and lime-mortar challenges. Significant industrial heritage in Govan, Maryhill and Springburn. Modern stock concentrated in the merchant city and west end. Permits and conditions run through Glasgow City Council Building Standards (Scotland uses Building Standards, not Building Control). All RAMS guides for Glasgow
Excavation RAMS in Edinburgh · Edinburgh & Lothians
Georgian New Town stock with strict listing controls, mediaeval Old Town with severe access constraints (closes, narrow wynds, multi-level frontages), and tenement stock in the south and west. Sandstone façades require lime-based mortars and trained stonemasons. Permits and conditions run through City of Edinburgh Council Building Standards. All RAMS guides for Edinburgh
Excavation RAMS in Bristol · South-West England
Bath stone and Pennant sandstone façades, Victorian terraces concentrated in Clifton, Redland and Southville, post-war estates undergoing regeneration, and a high proportion of harbourside conversions on former dock land. Permits and conditions run through Bristol City Council Building Control. All RAMS guides for Bristol
Excavation RAMS in Liverpool · Merseyside
Heavy Victorian commercial stock, Georgian and early Victorian terraces in the canning area, large warehouse buildings in the Baltic Triangle, and significant interwar and post-war housing across outer wards. Ground conditions are dominated by sandstone close to the centre. Permits and conditions run through Liverpool City Council Building Control. All RAMS guides for Liverpool
Excavation RAMS in Newcastle upon Tyne · Tyne and Wear
Distinctive Tyneside flat stock (paired ground- and first-floor flats with separate access), Grainger Town Georgian commercial stock in the centre, heavy Victorian and Edwardian terraces in Heaton, Jesmond and Gosforth, and modern build-to-rent stock around Pilgrim Street. Permits and conditions run through Newcastle City Council Building Control. All RAMS guides for Newcastle upon Tyne
Excavation RAMS in Cardiff · South Wales
Pennant sandstone Victorian terraces in Cathays, Roath and Canton; modern apartment stock in Cardiff Bay; and significant 1960s/70s office buildings across the central core. Ground conditions include reclaimed dock land in the Bay area and Triassic mudstones across the centre. Permits and conditions run through Cardiff Council Building Control. All RAMS guides for Cardiff
Excavation RAMS in Sheffield · South Yorkshire
Stone-built Victorian terraces, heavy industrial stock in Kelham Island and the Don Valley, post-war flats undergoing demolition or refurbishment, and modern build-to-rent around the city centre. Ground conditions include made-ground from former industrial use across much of the lower Don Valley. Permits and conditions run through Sheffield City Council Building Control. All RAMS guides for Sheffield
Excavation RAMS in Nottingham · East Midlands
Lace Market industrial stock with severe heritage controls, Victorian terraces across The Meadows, Sneinton and Radford, large 1960s/70s office stock around the central core, and significant student-housing development around the universities. Permits and conditions run through Nottingham City Council Building Control. All RAMS guides for Nottingham
Free RAMS builder

Create your RAMS free — preview before sign-up

Generate a preview first. Sign up only when you want to save, edit or export.

Final RAMS must be reviewed and approved by a competent person before use.