By the Riskora Editorial Team · Reviewed against our editorial standards · Last reviewed
Running an archaeological watching brief? Riskora generates structured RAMS covering excavation safety, coordination with construction, ground conditions, and site-specific hazards.
UK (RAMS) example document — Two-Storey Rear Extension — 14 Birchwood Lane, Reading. Client: Mr & Mrs A. Whitfield (Private Client). Site: 14 Birchwood Lane, Reading, RG1 5JT. Scope: Construction of a two-storey rear extension (6.4m × 4.2m) to an existing semi-detached dwelling. Works comprise breaking out of existing rear elevation, trench-fill foundations to 1.0m, traditional cavity blockwork to first floor, pre-stressed concrete lintels, timber roof structure with natural slate finish, plus alterations to existing rear wall to form structural opening with rolled steel joist (RSJ 203×102 UB23). Works programmed over 9 weeks with a peak site team of 6 operatives. Hazards assessed: Manual handling — blocks, lintels, plasterboard, Working at height — independent scaffold & roof structure, Buried services strike during excavation, Collapse of excavation / trench wall, Hand-arm vibration (HAVS) — breaking out, drilling, Silica dust — cutting blocks, brick, concrete, Vehicle/pedestrian segregation — narrow domestic street.

Full version
Takes less than 5 minutes
No card required · 1 free PDF · Upgrade any time (completely free)
Archaeological watching briefs often take place on active construction sites where the archaeologist works alongside heavy plant, open excavations, and changing ground conditions. The risks aren't academic — they include trench collapse, contact with moving machinery, exposure to contaminated ground, and the challenges of lone working in remote areas. Proper RAMS are essential, but most archaeological units end up adapting generic construction documents that don't reflect the specific nature of watching brief work. Understanding the legal requirements for risk assessments in the UK is the first step toward getting your documentation right.
Archaeological watching briefs on construction sites fall under CDM 2015 requirements. The archaeologist must be inducted onto the site and work within the principal contractor's safety management system, while maintaining their own task-specific RAMS.
Riskora includes archaeology-specific presets that cover watching brief scenarios — working in and around open trenches, coordination with machine operators, recording in confined spaces, and managing finds in contaminated ground. The system generates a RAMS that reflects the actual working conditions, not just a boilerplate construction document. For more complex projects, you may also need a standalone risk assessment or method statement.
Before you generate your document, these guides cover the knowledge that underpins every good RAMS, risk assessment, and method statement.
What Is a RAMS Document?
Understand the two components of a RAMS and why they're required before work begins on site.
How to Write a RAMS Document
A step-by-step guide to structuring your RAMS from project details through to sign-off.
UK Legal Requirements for Risk Assessments
What the law requires under MHSWR 1999 and CDM 2015, and what 'suitable and sufficient' means.
Who Needs a RAMS?
Find out whether your work requires a RAMS and who is responsible for producing one.
How to Write a RAMS (UK Guide)
A practical walkthrough of writing RAMS from scratch, covering structure, common mistakes, and what reviewers look for.
Construction Safety Documents Explained
An overview of the key safety documents required on UK construction sites and how they relate to each other.
Direct quotes from the named regulations, with plain-English explanations of what each one means in practice.
Regulation 22, Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015
“Where an excavation is liable to fall or dislodge material, suitable and sufficient steps must be taken to prevent any person from being buried or trapped, including by underground services.”
Watching-brief archaeologists work in live contractor excavations — CDM 2015 Reg 22 applies to them as if they were any other site operative. The RAMS must show the archaeologist is briefed into the contractor's excavation support, services, and exclusion zones.
Read the source on legislation.gov.uk →CIfA Standard and Guidance for an Archaeological Watching Brief (2020)
“The watching brief should be designed and undertaken so as to minimise risk to the archaeologist; the WSI must include a health and safety risk assessment that complements (not replaces) the principal contractor's RAMS.”
CIfA's standard is the professional benchmark UK heritage curators apply. The RAMS must reference the Written Scheme of Investigation (WSI) and explicitly map archaeological tasks onto the contractor's permit-to-dig and confined-space procedures.
Read the source on legislation.gov.uk →Regulation 6, Confined Spaces Regulations 1997
“No person at work shall enter or carry out work in a confined space unless there is, so far as is reasonably practicable, a system of work that has been planned, organised, performed and maintained so as to render that work safe.”
Watching-brief recording in deep trenches, wells, basements, and culverts triggers Confined Spaces Regs 1997. The RAMS must name the 4-gas monitor, the standby/top-man, and the rescue plan — recording an excavation does not exempt the archaeologist from these duties.
Read the source on legislation.gov.uk →Not every watching brief carries the same risk profile. The CIfA standard expects the WSI to grade the brief and the RAMS to match. The table below maps typical UK watching-brief contexts to the dominant hazard and the minimum control regime.
| Context | Dominant hazard | Minimum control | Permit / RAMS link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topsoil strip on greenfield | Plant–pedestrian segregation | High-vis Class 3; 360° exclusion radius | Contractor's plant RAMS; banksman protocol |
| Service trench < 1.2 m | Cable strike, light-vehicle traffic | CAT & Genny evidence; hard hat / boots | Permit-to-dig; HSG47 reference |
| Brownfield strip / urban | Contamination, asbestos, sharps | Pre-Phase 2 GI review; FFP3 + nitrile | Asbestos R&D survey; unexpected-find SOP |
| Deep trench / culvert / well | Confined space, collapse, water | 4-gas monitor, standby person, rescue kit | Confined Spaces Regs 1997 permit |
Sources: CIfA Standard & Guidance for an Archaeological Watching Brief (2020); FAME Health & Safety in Field Archaeology Manual; HSE HSG47; HSE L101 (Safe work in confined spaces). Original synthesis — confirm against the WSI and the principal contractor's CPP.
Will this take long?
Under 5 minutes. Select your trade, pick hazards, download.
Is it complicated?
No training needed. The guided builder walks you through every step.
Do I need experience?
If you know what work you're doing, you can use Riskora.
Is it free to try?
Yes. The Free plan needs no card — generate, review and download one free PDF. Upgrade any time for branding, DOCX, sign-off and higher limits.
Create your RAMS in under 5 minutes
No onboarding or setup needed — start generating documents instantly
Try Riskora FreeNo card required · 1 free PDF · Upgrade any time (completely free)
All documents generated by Riskora should be reviewed by a competent person before use on site. Riskora provides structured templates — professional judgement is always required.
Riskora builds a structured, client-facing document — not a generic AI paragraph. Every section is shaped around your job, your site and your team.
Task-specific hazards for the job, captured row by row — not a generic list pulled from an old RAMS.
Control measures mapped to each hazard with residual risk scoring after controls are applied.
PPE requirements tied to the activity and site, ready to brief to the team.
Step-by-step method statement structured around how the work is actually sequenced on site.
First aid, rescue plan, emergency contacts and site-specific escalation routes.
Substance prompts when the work involves chemicals, dusts, fumes or sealants — flagged early, not missed at review.
Operative sign-off captured against the document — names, dates and acknowledgement of the brief.
Every change tracked so you can show what was issued, when, and which version the team signed.
Clear approval state on every document — draft, in review, approved, issued — visible across the team.
Who created it, who reviewed it, who signed it. A complete trail you can hand to a principal contractor or auditor.
The reason RAMS get rejected is rarely the format — it's that the document is obviously generic. Riskora rebuilds it around this job, this site and this task.
Generic template copied from an old job.
Site-specific document structured around this job, site and task.
A four-step workflow used by contractors, consultants and safety teams to turn informal job details into client-ready safety paperwork.
Drop in a client email, a WhatsApp from the site manager, a scope of works or a tender note. Anything that describes the job.
Riskora turns your brief into hazards, controls, method steps, PPE, emergency arrangements and COSHH prompts.
You stay in control of every section. Tweak anything, then download a clean PDF or share a link.
Brief operatives, capture their sign-off and keep a full audit trail of who signed which version.
Riskora is built by a founder with hands-on site and document experience — designed for contractors, consultants and safety teams who need to issue, brief and prove safety paperwork without losing a day to admin.
No training. No complex setup. Just select your trade and go.
Start Your RAMS Now — It's FreeNo card required · 1 free PDF · Upgrade for branding, DOCX, sign-off and audit trails (completely free)
Primary UK sources covering the legal and practical framework behind RAMS, risk assessments and method statements.
Generate a preview first. Sign up only when you want to save, edit or export.
Final RAMS must be reviewed and approved by a competent person before use.
Riskora is an assistive document preparation tool. All documents generated must be reviewed, verified, and approved by a competent person before use on site. Riskora does not replace professional safety judgment, and no output should be treated as a legal compliance guarantee.