By the Riskora Editorial Team · Reviewed against our editorial standards · Last reviewed
Generate a structured risk assessment for deep excavation work — covering trench collapse prevention, shoring and support systems, service detection, groundwater management, and plant proximity controls.
UK (RAMS) example document — Two-Storey Rear Extension — 14 Birchwood Lane, Reading. Client: Mr & Mrs A. Whitfield (Private Client). Site: 14 Birchwood Lane, Reading, RG1 5JT. Scope: Construction of a two-storey rear extension (6.4m × 4.2m) to an existing semi-detached dwelling. Works comprise breaking out of existing rear elevation, trench-fill foundations to 1.0m, traditional cavity blockwork to first floor, pre-stressed concrete lintels, timber roof structure with natural slate finish, plus alterations to existing rear wall to form structural opening with rolled steel joist (RSJ 203×102 UB23). Works programmed over 9 weeks with a peak site team of 6 operatives. Hazards assessed: Manual handling — blocks, lintels, plasterboard, Working at height — independent scaffold & roof structure, Buried services strike during excavation, Collapse of excavation / trench wall, Hand-arm vibration (HAVS) — breaking out, drilling, Silica dust — cutting blocks, brick, concrete, Vehicle/pedestrian segregation — narrow domestic street.

Full version
Takes less than 5 minutes
No card required · 1 free PDF · Upgrade any time (completely free)
A deep excavation risk assessment must cover the excavation depth and dimensions, soil type and stability assessment, support system selection (battering, stepping, trench sheets, hydraulic shoring), service detection and avoidance procedures, groundwater assessment and dewatering, edge protection and access arrangements, proximity of adjacent structures and their foundations, plant operating near excavation edges, and rescue arrangements for persons falling into or trapped in excavations.
Excavation collapse is one of the most foreseeable yet frequently fatal incidents in construction and groundworks. A cubic metre of soil weighs approximately 1.5 tonnes — enough to crush and suffocate a worker in seconds. Collapse can be triggered by surcharge loading (plant or materials near the edge), vibration, water ingress, or simply failing to support an excavation that was deeper than expected. Deep excavations also concentrate other risks — service strikes are more likely as depth increases, access and egress become more difficult, and rescue in the event of collapse is extremely challenging. Many professionals are unsure about the legal requirements for safety documentation.
Riskora generates deep excavation risk assessments that address soil classification, support system selection, service detection, groundwater management, and rescue planning. Specify your excavation depth, ground conditions, and proximity to services and structures, and the tool generates a comprehensive risk assessment with proportionate controls for the depth and conditions you're working in. You can also use our standalone risk assessment builder or method statement tool.
Before you generate your document, these guides cover the knowledge that underpins every good RAMS, risk assessment, and method statement.
UK Legal Requirements for Risk Assessments
What the law requires for risk assessments under MHSWR 1999 and when they must be recorded.
RAMS vs Risk Assessment
When a standalone risk assessment is enough and when you need a full RAMS document.
How to Write a RAMS Document
If your risk assessment needs to be part of a RAMS, this guide covers the full structure.
What Is a RAMS Document?
Learn how risk assessments fit within the RAMS framework used across UK construction.
Construction Safety Documents Explained
An overview of the key safety documents required on UK construction sites and how they relate to each other.
RAMS vs Risk Assessment — Key Differences
When you need a full RAMS versus a standalone risk assessment, and how the two documents work together.
There is no fixed depth at which support becomes a legal requirement — the Regulations require that excavations are supported where there is a risk of collapse. In practice, most excavations over 1.2m deep require some form of support (battering, stepping, shoring, or trench sheets), but collapse can occur at shallower depths in poor ground conditions. The risk assessment must evaluate the specific soil conditions, not rely on a generic depth threshold.
Common support methods include: battering back the sides to a safe angle (typically 45° or shallower depending on soil), stepping in stages, trench sheets driven behind steel walings, hydraulic shoring frames (quick and adjustable), and sheet piling for deep or water-bearing excavations. Your risk assessment should justify the selection based on soil type, depth, duration, and site constraints.
Will this take long?
Under 5 minutes. Select your trade, pick hazards, download.
Is it complicated?
No training needed. The guided builder walks you through every step.
Do I need experience?
If you know what work you're doing, you can use Riskora.
Is it free to try?
Yes. The Free plan needs no card — generate, review and download one free PDF. Upgrade any time for branding, DOCX, sign-off and higher limits.
Create your RAMS in under 5 minutes
No onboarding or setup needed — start generating documents instantly
Try Riskora FreeNo card required · 1 free PDF · Upgrade any time (completely free)
All documents generated by Riskora should be reviewed by a competent person before use on site. Riskora provides structured templates — professional judgement is always required.
"Trench collapse gives no warning. One moment the ground looks stable. The next, 1.5 tonnes of soil per cubic metre is on top of someone. The risk assessment is the only thing standing between those two moments."
Riskora builds a structured, client-facing document — not a generic AI paragraph. Every section is shaped around your job, your site and your team.
Task-specific hazards for the job, captured row by row — not a generic list pulled from an old RAMS.
Control measures mapped to each hazard with residual risk scoring after controls are applied.
PPE requirements tied to the activity and site, ready to brief to the team.
Step-by-step method statement structured around how the work is actually sequenced on site.
First aid, rescue plan, emergency contacts and site-specific escalation routes.
Substance prompts when the work involves chemicals, dusts, fumes or sealants — flagged early, not missed at review.
Operative sign-off captured against the document — names, dates and acknowledgement of the brief.
Every change tracked so you can show what was issued, when, and which version the team signed.
Clear approval state on every document — draft, in review, approved, issued — visible across the team.
Who created it, who reviewed it, who signed it. A complete trail you can hand to a principal contractor or auditor.
The reason RAMS get rejected is rarely the format — it's that the document is obviously generic. Riskora rebuilds it around this job, this site and this task.
Generic template copied from an old job.
Site-specific document structured around this job, site and task.
A four-step workflow used by contractors, consultants and safety teams to turn informal job details into client-ready safety paperwork.
Drop in a client email, a WhatsApp from the site manager, a scope of works or a tender note. Anything that describes the job.
Riskora turns your brief into hazards, controls, method steps, PPE, emergency arrangements and COSHH prompts.
You stay in control of every section. Tweak anything, then download a clean PDF or share a link.
Brief operatives, capture their sign-off and keep a full audit trail of who signed which version.
Riskora is built by a founder with hands-on site and document experience — designed for contractors, consultants and safety teams who need to issue, brief and prove safety paperwork without losing a day to admin.
No training. No complex setup. Just select your trade and go.
Start Your RAMS Now — It's FreeNo card required · 1 free PDF · Upgrade for branding, DOCX, sign-off and audit trails (completely free)
Primary UK sources covering the legal and practical framework behind RAMS, risk assessments and method statements.
Generate a preview first. Sign up only when you want to save, edit or export.
Final RAMS must be reviewed and approved by a competent person before use.
Riskora is an assistive document preparation tool. All documents generated must be reviewed, verified, and approved by a competent person before use on site. Riskora does not replace professional safety judgment, and no output should be treated as a legal compliance guarantee.