RAMS for Tiling Work (UK)

By the Riskora Editorial Team · Reviewed against our editorial standards · Last reviewed

Tiling work generates respirable crystalline silica from wet and dry cutting, exposes operatives to adhesive and grout sensitisers, and creates serious manual-handling and slip hazards. Riskora generates a structured tiling RAMS that addresses these risks specifically — not as generic construction line items.

Under 5 minutesNo training neededPDF download

UK (RAMS) example document — Two-Storey Rear Extension — 14 Birchwood Lane, Reading. Client: Mr & Mrs A. Whitfield (Private Client). Site: 14 Birchwood Lane, Reading, RG1 5JT. Scope: Construction of a two-storey rear extension (6.4m × 4.2m) to an existing semi-detached dwelling. Works comprise breaking out of existing rear elevation, trench-fill foundations to 1.0m, traditional cavity blockwork to first floor, pre-stressed concrete lintels, timber roof structure with natural slate finish, plus alterations to existing rear wall to form structural opening with rolled steel joist (RSJ 203×102 UB23). Works programmed over 9 weeks with a peak site team of 6 operatives. Hazards assessed: Manual handling — blocks, lintels, plasterboard, Working at height — independent scaffold & roof structure, Buried services strike during excavation, Collapse of excavation / trench wall, Hand-arm vibration (HAVS) — breaking out, drilling, Silica dust — cutting blocks, brick, concrete, Vehicle/pedestrian segregation — narrow domestic street.

Example UK (RAMS) front cover produced by Riskora
Try the new compact mode. Same document, just more compact

Full version

Start Your RAMS Now — It's Free

Takes less than 5 minutes

No card required · 1 free PDF · Upgrade any time (completely free)

What should a tiling RAMS cover?

A tiling RAMS must cover silica dust control during cutting (water suppression or LEV), COSHH controls for adhesives and grouts (skin sensitisers, isocyanates in some products), manual handling of tile boxes and large-format tiles, kneeling and stooped working postures, slip hazards from wet adhesives and floor preparation, electrical safety for wet cutting, and disposal of cementitious waste. It should reference HSG258 for dust and the COSHH Regulations 2002 for chemical exposures.

Tiling Hazards Are Routinely Underestimated

Tiling looks low-risk compared to working at height or excavation, but it accounts for a steady stream of long-latency health claims in the UK construction sector. Dry-cutting porcelain or natural stone with an angle grinder generates respirable silica well above the workplace exposure limit. Cement-based grouts and adhesives cause irritant and allergic dermatitis. Sustained kneeling damages knees and lower back. And wet floors during preparation and grouting are a leading cause of same-level slip injuries. A generic construction RAMS will not address any of these in the detail a principal contractor expects. UK risk-assessment law requires controls to be specific to the actual hazards present.

HSE's HSG258 makes clear that dry-cutting tiles without water suppression or LEV will exceed the silica workplace exposure limit within minutes. Tiling RAMS must specify the cutting method and the dust control.

How Riskora Helps

Riskora's tiling preset loads silica-dust controls (wet cutting, on-tool extraction, FFP3 RPE), COSHH lines for cement-based and epoxy adhesives, manual-handling controls for large-format tiles, kneeling-pad and rotation requirements, and slip-management procedures for wet phases. You confirm the site specifics — adhesive product, cutting method, area type — and download a document a competent person would recognise as fit for purpose. For the standalone risk-assessment portion you can also use our risk assessment builder.

Who it's for

  • Tiling subcontractors submitting RAMS for new-build apartment fit-outs
  • Bathroom and wet-room installers documenting waterproofing and tiling phases
  • Commercial fit-out contractors tiling kitchens, washrooms and back-of-house areas
  • Natural stone specialists handling large-format porcelain and stone slabs

Key Risks and Considerations

  • Respirable crystalline silica from cutting porcelain, ceramic and stone
  • Allergic and irritant dermatitis from cement-based adhesives and grouts
  • Isocyanate exposure from some two-part epoxy grouts
  • Manual-handling injury from large-format tiles (commonly 1.2m × 0.6m and above)
  • Knee and lower-back MSDs from sustained kneeling
  • Slips on wet adhesive, SLC and grout-haze water
  • Electric shock from wet cutters used near mains supplies

Key Features

  • Silica dust controls (wet cutting, on-tool extraction, FFP3 RPE)
  • COSHH lines for cement-based, ready-mix and epoxy products
  • Large-format tile manual-handling controls
  • Kneeling and stooped-posture MSD controls
  • Wet-phase slip and electrical-safety procedures
  • PDF download accepted by principal contractors

Example Structure (UK Standard)

  1. Project Details and Tiling Scope (areas, tile type, adhesive product)
  2. Risk Assessment — Dust, COSHH, Manual Handling, Slips, Electrical
  3. Method Statement — Substrate Preparation, Setting Out, Cutting, Fixing, Grouting, Sealing
  4. COSHH Sheets for Adhesive and Grout Products
  5. PPE Schedule (FFP3 RPE for cutting, gloves, kneepads, eye protection)
  6. Waste and Site-Cleaning Procedure
  7. Sign-Off Sheet

Common Questions Before Getting Started

Will this take long?

Under 5 minutes. Select your trade, pick hazards, download.

Is it complicated?

No training needed. The guided builder walks you through every step.

Do I need experience?

If you know what work you're doing, you can use Riskora.

Is it free to try?

Yes. The Free plan needs no card — generate, review and download one free PDF. Upgrade any time for branding, DOCX, sign-off and higher limits.

Create your RAMS in under 5 minutes

No onboarding or setup needed — start generating documents instantly

Try Riskora Free

No card required · 1 free PDF · Upgrade any time (completely free)

Used by contractors and professionalsNo learning curveDocuments ready in minutes
Built for real job scenarios · Used by UK contractors and professionals

All documents generated by Riskora should be reviewed by a competent person before use on site. Riskora provides structured templates — professional judgement is always required.

Inside the document

What your RAMS actually contains

Riskora builds a structured, client-facing document — not a generic AI paragraph. Every section is shaped around your job, your site and your team.

  • Hazards

    Task-specific hazards for the job, captured row by row — not a generic list pulled from an old RAMS.

  • Controls

    Control measures mapped to each hazard with residual risk scoring after controls are applied.

  • PPE

    PPE requirements tied to the activity and site, ready to brief to the team.

  • Method steps

    Step-by-step method statement structured around how the work is actually sequenced on site.

  • Emergency arrangements

    First aid, rescue plan, emergency contacts and site-specific escalation routes.

  • COSHH prompts

    Substance prompts when the work involves chemicals, dusts, fumes or sealants — flagged early, not missed at review.

  • Sign-off

    Operative sign-off captured against the document — names, dates and acknowledgement of the brief.

  • Version history

    Every change tracked so you can show what was issued, when, and which version the team signed.

  • Approval status

    Clear approval state on every document — draft, in review, approved, issued — visible across the team.

  • Audit trail

    Who created it, who reviewed it, who signed it. A complete trail you can hand to a principal contractor or auditor.

Before & after

From copied-and-pasted to site-specific

The reason RAMS get rejected is rarely the format — it's that the document is obviously generic. Riskora rebuilds it around this job, this site and this task.

Before

Generic template copied from an old job.

  • • Hazards and controls that don't match this site or task.
  • • Method steps written for a different sequence of work.
  • • No emergency arrangements specific to the location.
  • • Client flags it as generic and asks for a rewrite.
After

Site-specific document structured around this job, site and task.

  • • Hazards captured from the actual scope you pasted in.
  • • Method steps sequenced for how the work runs on site.
  • • Emergency arrangements and rescue plan tied to the location.
  • • Approved internally, briefed to the team, signed off and stored.
How it works

From job details to signed-off document

A four-step workflow used by contractors, consultants and safety teams to turn informal job details into client-ready safety paperwork.

  1. 1
    Paste job details

    Drop in a client email, a WhatsApp from the site manager, a scope of works or a tender note. Anything that describes the job.

  2. 2
    Riskora structures the document

    Riskora turns your brief into hazards, controls, method steps, PPE, emergency arrangements and COSHH prompts.

  3. 3
    Review, edit and download

    You stay in control of every section. Tweak anything, then download a clean PDF or share a link.

  4. 4
    Brief the team and record sign-off

    Brief operatives, capture their sign-off and keep a full audit trail of who signed which version.

Built for site reality

Built by people who've written this paperwork on real sites

Riskora is built by a founder with hands-on site and document experience — designed for contractors, consultants and safety teams who need to issue, brief and prove safety paperwork without losing a day to admin.

  • Built for contractors, consultants and teams
    Solo trades, principal contractors and in-house safety teams all run on the same workflow.
  • Supports multiple countries
    UK, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, US and Canada — wording and document types match the local standard.
  • Not just documents
    Sign-off, approvals, version history and an audit trail — the management workflow around the paperwork.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes when dry cutting, and recommended even with wet cutting in confined or poorly ventilated areas. Wet cutting suppresses most respirable silica but a fine mist can still be generated, so FFP3 is the safe default for repetitive cutting.

The COSHH section lets you record the actual product brand, hazard pictograms and SDS reference. The default content covers cement-based and ready-mixed adhesives; epoxy systems are flagged with additional skin-sensitisation controls.

The method statement includes a step for confirming UFH cables are isolated and protected during cutting and fixing. Damage to UFH during tiling is a common and expensive defect — the RAMS records the control.

Yes. The output is in the standard UK RAMS format with risk matrix, method statement, COSHH and PPE schedules. Most Tier 1 contractors will sign it off without amendment, and any specific site rules can be added before submission.

Ready? It takes less than 5 minutes.

No training. No complex setup. Just select your trade and go.

Start Your RAMS Now — It's Free

No card required · 1 free PDF · Upgrade for branding, DOCX, sign-off and audit trails (completely free)

Already have a RAMS? Upload and rebuild it

References & Further Reading

Primary UK sources covering the legal and practical framework behind RAMS, risk assessments and method statements.

Free RAMS builder

Create your tiling work uk RAMS free — preview before sign-up

Generate a preview first. Sign up only when you want to save, edit or export.

Final RAMS must be reviewed and approved by a competent person before use.

Riskora is an assistive document preparation tool. All documents generated must be reviewed, verified, and approved by a competent person before use on site. Riskora does not replace professional safety judgment, and no output should be treated as a legal compliance guarantee.