RAMS for Painting & Decorating UK – Generate in Minutes

By the Riskora Editorial Team · Reviewed against our editorial standards · Last reviewed

Painting RAMS that survive principal-contractor review: lead-paint disturbance under CLAW 2002, isocyanate and solvent spray under COSHH reg 11, MEWP / tower / podium access under WAH 2005, and DSEAR exclusion zones during atomised spray. Generate a site-ready document in under five minutes.

Under 5 minutesNo training neededPDF download

UK (RAMS) example document — Two-Storey Rear Extension — 14 Birchwood Lane, Reading. Client: Mr & Mrs A. Whitfield (Private Client). Site: 14 Birchwood Lane, Reading, RG1 5JT. Scope: Construction of a two-storey rear extension (6.4m × 4.2m) to an existing semi-detached dwelling. Works comprise breaking out of existing rear elevation, trench-fill foundations to 1.0m, traditional cavity blockwork to first floor, pre-stressed concrete lintels, timber roof structure with natural slate finish, plus alterations to existing rear wall to form structural opening with rolled steel joist (RSJ 203×102 UB23). Works programmed over 9 weeks with a peak site team of 6 operatives. Hazards assessed: Manual handling — blocks, lintels, plasterboard, Working at height — independent scaffold & roof structure, Buried services strike during excavation, Collapse of excavation / trench wall, Hand-arm vibration (HAVS) — breaking out, drilling, Silica dust — cutting blocks, brick, concrete, Vehicle/pedestrian segregation — narrow domestic street.

Example UK (RAMS) front cover produced by Riskora
Try the new compact mode. Same document, just more compact

Full version

Start Your RAMS Now — It's Free

Takes less than 5 minutes

No card required · 1 free PDF · Upgrade any time (completely free)

Why Off-the-Shelf Painting RAMS Get Rejected

Painting submissions are returned at pre-start for predictable reasons: no XRF or swab test recorded on pre-1960 substrate, COSHH assessments copied from the wrong SDS, spray exclusion zones missing from the method, and a single "fall from height" line where a podium → tower → MEWP hierarchy belongs. Generic Word templates can't carry the regulation references — CLAW 2002, COSHH reg 11, EH40/2005 WELs, WAH 2005 — that a CDM principal contractor expects to see cross-referenced inside the document, not just listed on the cover.

HSE statistics consistently show construction as the sector with the highest number of workplace fatalities in the UK.

How Riskora Helps

Riskora pre-loads the painting-specific hazard register — lead, solvents, 2-pack isocyanates, dermatitis, DSEAR ignition during spray, falls from tower or MEWP — each mapped to the correct UK regulation with the right control hierarchy already in place. Pick interior repaint, external decoration or spray-applied protective coating, add the address and substrate age, and download. If you're new to the format, our step-by-step guide to writing a RAMS explains the structure before you generate.

Who it's for

  • Contractors preparing RAMS for principal contractor approval
  • Site managers reviewing documentation before work begins
  • Subcontractors producing task-specific safety documentation
  • Safety professionals standardising documentation quality

Painting & Decorating — Hazard Register (Site-Typical Entries)

Below are the hazards principal contractors most commonly query on painting RAMS submissions. Pre-1960s repaint, spray application and any work above 2 m should always appear on the register — omission is the single biggest reason painting RAMS are rejected on first review.

HazardWho is at riskPrimary controlRegulation reference
Lead in paint (pre-1960s substrate)Operative, occupants, cleanersXRF/swab test before disturbance; wet sanding + HEPA H-class vac; FFP3 RPECLAW 2002
Solvent vapour (oil-based undercoat, MEK cleaners)Operative, adjacent tradesSubstitute to water-based where specified; mechanical ventilation; A2/P3 RPE for sustained sprayCOSHH 2002 reg 7
Isocyanate exposure (2-pack PU on metalwork)Sprayer, prep operativeBooth or enclosure with LEV; air-fed visor; health surveillance (HSG283)COSHH 2002 reg 11
Fall from MEWP/podium/tower (eaves, stairwell, soffit)OperativePASMA-erected tower or IPAF MEWP; harness + 1.75 m lanyard in boom; rescue plan on boardWAH 2005 reg 6
Dermatitis from prolonged solvent/epoxy contactOperativeNitrile gloves changed per shift; pre/post barrier cream; skin checks recordedCOSHH 2002 + HSG262
Slips on overspray / spilled paintAll site personnelFloor protection (correx + tape); spill kit at point of use; exclusion barriers during sprayWHSWR 1992 reg 12
Fire/explosion (solvent storage, spray atomisation)All site personnelMax 50 L solvent in workshop; bonded steel cabinet; hot works embargo within 3 m during sprayDSEAR 2002

UK Regulations That Apply to Painting & Decorating

  • Control of Lead at Work Regulations 2002 (CLAW) — any disturbance of paint on a substrate painted before 1960 must be preceded by a lead test. If lead is present, the work becomes "significant" and triggers blood-lead monitoring, washing facilities and segregated waste handling.
  • COSHH 2002 — every product on site needs an assessment driven by the SDS, not by guesswork. Solvent-based primers, MEK/IPA cleaners, isocyanate 2-pack finishes and biocidal fungicidal washes all carry WELs that the RAMS must reference (see EH40/2005).
  • Work at Height Regulations 2005 — applies to any work where a person could fall a distance liable to cause injury. The hierarchy (avoid → prevent → mitigate) must be visible in the method: ground-level pole sanding before tower work, tower before harness, harness before fall arrest.
  • DSEAR 2002 — solvent-based spray creates an explosive atmosphere within the cone. Spray zones need exclusion, no ignition sources within 3 m, and a written hazardous-area classification if spraying internally for more than 30 minutes per shift.
  • CDM 2015 — the contractor is responsible for planning, managing and monitoring the painting works; the principal contractor must include the painting RAMS in the construction phase plan before work starts on a notifiable site.
  • EAW 1989 — 110 V transformers for all site-supplied tools (sanders, hot air guns); RCD on any 230 V cordless charger left on site.

Painting & Decorating — Method Statement Excerpt

The following is the structured task sequence Riskora generates for a typical interior repaint / spray-applied protective coating job. Each numbered step maps to a controlled hazard in the register above.

  1. Sign in at site office; collect site-specific induction and confirm permit-to-work for spray application is open.
  2. Lead test on any substrate dated pre-1960 (XRF or 3M LeadCheck swab). Record result on RAMS cover sheet. If positive, stop and re-issue under CLAW protocol.
  3. Establish exclusion zone with hard barriers and signage; brief adjacent trades and update fire-marshal board.
  4. Lay floor protection (correx + low-tack tape at perimeter). Mask glazing, switches, ironmongery.
  5. Erect PASMA-certified mobile tower or position IPAF-operated MEWP. Inspect (TG20 / Thorough Examination cert) and tag.
  6. Surface prep: HEPA H-class vacuum-extracted sander on filler and existing coatings; no dry abrasion of pre-1960 paint.
  7. Spot-prime bare substrate; allow recoat interval per TDS before mist coat.
  8. Spray application: A2/P3 half-mask (or air-fed visor for isocyanate); confirm LEV running; no other operatives within 5 m cone.
  9. Two-coat finish: brush/roller cutting in, then rolled or sprayed full coat. Check wet film thickness per TDS.
  10. Decommission tower/MEWP at end of shift; secure all solvent containers in bonded cabinet; remove waste rags in sealed metal bin.
  11. Daily housekeeping: HEPA vacuum, damp wipe, segregated waste streams (hazardous EWC 08 01 11 for solvent paint, 08 01 17 for lead).
  12. Sign off snags with site manager; lift exclusion; record permit closure.

PPE & Competency Requirements

Minimum PPE on task

  • EN 397 hard hat, EN ISO 20345 S3 safety footwear, hi-vis
  • Nitrile gloves (EN 374) for solvent / epoxy handling — single-shift use
  • Disposable Type 5/6 coverall when spraying or sanding lead
  • FFP3 disposable mask (EN 149) or A2/P3 reusable half-mask for solvent spray; air-fed visor (EN 14594) for isocyanate
  • Chemical splash goggles (EN 166) during decant and spray
  • Personal fall-arrest harness (EN 361) with 1.75 m energy-absorbing lanyard when in MEWP boom

Competency / cards

  • CSCS card (Painter & Decorator NVQ Level 2 or equivalent) for the trade
  • PASMA for mobile tower erection / dismantle / alteration
  • IPAF 3a (vertical) or 3b (boom) for MEWP operation
  • UK Asbestos Awareness (Cat A) — refreshed annually
  • Face-fit test (qualitative or quantitative) for any tight-fitting RPE, within 24 months
  • Manual handling training where 25 L drums are moved without mechanical aid

Key Features

  • Task-specific hazard libraries
  • Pre-loaded control measures and method steps
  • Risk matrix with severity and likelihood scoring
  • Professional formatting accepted by principal contractors
  • Version control and document history
  • Download to PDF

Common Questions Before Getting Started

Will this take long?

Under 5 minutes. Select your trade, pick hazards, download.

Is it complicated?

No training needed. The guided builder walks you through every step.

Do I need experience?

If you know what work you're doing, you can use Riskora.

Is it free to try?

Yes. The Free plan needs no card — generate, review and download one free PDF. Upgrade any time for branding, DOCX, sign-off and higher limits.

Create your RAMS in under 5 minutes

No onboarding or setup needed — start generating documents instantly

Try Riskora Free

No card required · 1 free PDF · Upgrade any time (completely free)

Used by contractors and professionalsNo learning curveDocuments ready in minutes
Built for real job scenarios · Used by UK contractors and professionals

All documents generated by Riskora should be reviewed by a competent person before use on site. Riskora provides structured templates — professional judgement is always required.

Inside the document

What your RAMS actually contains

Riskora builds a structured, client-facing document — not a generic AI paragraph. Every section is shaped around your job, your site and your team.

  • Hazards

    Task-specific hazards for the job, captured row by row — not a generic list pulled from an old RAMS.

  • Controls

    Control measures mapped to each hazard with residual risk scoring after controls are applied.

  • PPE

    PPE requirements tied to the activity and site, ready to brief to the team.

  • Method steps

    Step-by-step method statement structured around how the work is actually sequenced on site.

  • Emergency arrangements

    First aid, rescue plan, emergency contacts and site-specific escalation routes.

  • COSHH prompts

    Substance prompts when the work involves chemicals, dusts, fumes or sealants — flagged early, not missed at review.

  • Sign-off

    Operative sign-off captured against the document — names, dates and acknowledgement of the brief.

  • Version history

    Every change tracked so you can show what was issued, when, and which version the team signed.

  • Approval status

    Clear approval state on every document — draft, in review, approved, issued — visible across the team.

  • Audit trail

    Who created it, who reviewed it, who signed it. A complete trail you can hand to a principal contractor or auditor.

Before & after

From copied-and-pasted to site-specific

The reason RAMS get rejected is rarely the format — it's that the document is obviously generic. Riskora rebuilds it around this job, this site and this task.

Before

Generic template copied from an old job.

  • • Hazards and controls that don't match this site or task.
  • • Method steps written for a different sequence of work.
  • • No emergency arrangements specific to the location.
  • • Client flags it as generic and asks for a rewrite.
After

Site-specific document structured around this job, site and task.

  • • Hazards captured from the actual scope you pasted in.
  • • Method steps sequenced for how the work runs on site.
  • • Emergency arrangements and rescue plan tied to the location.
  • • Approved internally, briefed to the team, signed off and stored.
How it works

From job details to signed-off document

A four-step workflow used by contractors, consultants and safety teams to turn informal job details into client-ready safety paperwork.

  1. 1
    Paste job details

    Drop in a client email, a WhatsApp from the site manager, a scope of works or a tender note. Anything that describes the job.

  2. 2
    Riskora structures the document

    Riskora turns your brief into hazards, controls, method steps, PPE, emergency arrangements and COSHH prompts.

  3. 3
    Review, edit and download

    You stay in control of every section. Tweak anything, then download a clean PDF or share a link.

  4. 4
    Brief the team and record sign-off

    Brief operatives, capture their sign-off and keep a full audit trail of who signed which version.

Built for site reality

Built by people who've written this paperwork on real sites

Riskora is built by a founder with hands-on site and document experience — designed for contractors, consultants and safety teams who need to issue, brief and prove safety paperwork without losing a day to admin.

  • Built for contractors, consultants and teams
    Solo trades, principal contractors and in-house safety teams all run on the same workflow.
  • Supports multiple countries
    UK, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, US and Canada — wording and document types match the local standard.
  • Not just documents
    Sign-off, approvals, version history and an audit trail — the management workflow around the paperwork.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. CLAW 2002 reg 5 requires a 'suitable and sufficient' assessment before disturbance, which in practice means an XRF reading or 3M LeadCheck swab on any substrate dated pre-1960. Record the result on the RAMS cover sheet. A positive reading turns the work into 'significant' exposure and triggers wet sanding, HEPA H-class extraction, FFP3 RPE, blood-lead monitoring and segregated waste under EWC 08 01 17.

An air-fed visor compliant with EN 14594 — never a half-mask alone. COSHH 2002 reg 11 treats isocyanate as a respiratory sensitiser with no safe threshold, and HSG283 requires statutory health surveillance for anyone exposed. A reusable A2/P3 half-mask is only acceptable for solvent-based finishes that do not contain isocyanate.

Yes. Riskora generates professional documents in the standard UK format with risk matrices, control measures, and method statements that principal contractors expect.

Yes. Every section is editable. Add, remove, or modify hazards, controls, and method steps to match your specific site conditions.

Ready? It takes less than 5 minutes.

No training. No complex setup. Just select your trade and go.

Start Your RAMS Now — It's Free

No card required · 1 free PDF · Upgrade for branding, DOCX, sign-off and audit trails (completely free)

Already have a RAMS? Upload and rebuild it

References & Further Reading

Primary UK sources covering the legal and practical framework behind RAMS, risk assessments and method statements.

Free RAMS builder

Create your painting decorating uk RAMS free — preview before sign-up

Generate a preview first. Sign up only when you want to save, edit or export.

Final RAMS must be reviewed and approved by a competent person before use.

Riskora is an assistive document preparation tool. All documents generated must be reviewed, verified, and approved by a competent person before use on site. Riskora does not replace professional safety judgment, and no output should be treated as a legal compliance guarantee.