RAMS for System Scaffold UK – Generate in Minutes

By the Riskora Editorial Team · Reviewed against our editorial standards · Last reviewed

System-scaffold RAMS that pass NASC and CISRS audit: Layher / HAKI / Cuplok erection sequencing, advance-guardrail (AGR) discipline, SG4:22 collective fall protection, and TG20:21 tie-pattern compliance. Generate a site-ready document in under five minutes.

Under 5 minutesNo training neededPDF download

UK (RAMS) example document — Two-Storey Rear Extension — 14 Birchwood Lane, Reading. Client: Mr & Mrs A. Whitfield (Private Client). Site: 14 Birchwood Lane, Reading, RG1 5JT. Scope: Construction of a two-storey rear extension (6.4m × 4.2m) to an existing semi-detached dwelling. Works comprise breaking out of existing rear elevation, trench-fill foundations to 1.0m, traditional cavity blockwork to first floor, pre-stressed concrete lintels, timber roof structure with natural slate finish, plus alterations to existing rear wall to form structural opening with rolled steel joist (RSJ 203×102 UB23). Works programmed over 9 weeks with a peak site team of 6 operatives. Hazards assessed: Manual handling — blocks, lintels, plasterboard, Working at height — independent scaffold & roof structure, Buried services strike during excavation, Collapse of excavation / trench wall, Hand-arm vibration (HAVS) — breaking out, drilling, Silica dust — cutting blocks, brick, concrete, Vehicle/pedestrian segregation — narrow domestic street.

Example UK (RAMS) front cover produced by Riskora
Try the new compact mode. Same document, just more compact

Full version

Start Your RAMS Now — It's Free

Takes less than 5 minutes

No card required · 1 free PDF · Upgrade any time (completely free)

Why Generic Scaffold RAMS Fail SG4 Audit

System-scaffold submissions are rejected when erection and dismantle aren't separated into distinct method sequences, when advance-guardrail (AGR) discipline isn't named, and when the supporting TG20:21 compliance sheet or bespoke design drawing isn't cross-referenced inside the RAMS. SG4:22 expects collective protection at every working lift — a generic "harness if working at height" line will fail audit because harness is mitigation, not prevention, and a competent auditor will see that immediately.

Scaffold-related incidents including collapse and falls during erection/dismantling account for a significant proportion of construction fatalities.

How Riskora Helps

Riskora pre-loads the system-scaffold hazard register NASC and CISRS auditors actually check — falling persons and objects during erect / dismantle, tie failure, base-jack overload, overhead services, mixing components across systems — each mapped to WAH 2005, TG20:21 and SG4:22. Pick Layher Allround, HAKI Universal or Cuplok, set lift heights, tie pattern and live load class, then download. Need a standalone document for a complex package? Pair with a risk assessment or method statement.

Who it's for

  • Contractors preparing RAMS for principal contractor approval
  • Site managers reviewing documentation before work begins
  • Subcontractors producing task-specific safety documentation
  • Safety professionals standardising documentation quality

System Scaffold — Hazard Register (Site-Typical Entries)

Layher / HAKI / Cuplok / Kwikstage erection has a different residual hazard profile to tube-and-fitting work — the connection mechanism removes some hazards (slipped couplers) and introduces others (component mis-pairing, ledger end fracture). This register reflects what reviewers expect on a system-scaffold-specific RAMS.

HazardWho is at riskPrimary controlRegulation reference
Fall from leading edge during lift erectionScaffolder, advanced traineeAdvance guard-rail method (NASC SG4:22) — temporary handrail installed before access; harness as fallback onlyWAH 2005 + NASC SG4:22
Collapse — inadequate foundation / sole-board bearingAll site personnelBearing-capacity calc by competent person (TG20:21); base plates on continuous sole boards; never on uncompacted fillCDM 2015 reg 19
Component mis-pairing — non-original ledgers/standardsScaffolder, end usersSingle-system rule on each lift; visual ID at yard load-out; reject foreign components on sitePUWER 1998 reg 4 + 8
Wind uplift on sheeted / netted scaffoldScaffolder, publicTG20:21 wind region check; tie pattern revised for sheeting; stop work at gusts > mph defined in handoverWAH 2005 reg 4
Falling components during dismantleOperatives below, publicHand-down sequence (never throw); enclosed chute or tag-line to ground; exclusion zone with banksmanCDM 2015 reg 13
Manual handling — ledgers, transoms (~15–22 kg)ScaffolderPass-up sequence one lift at a time; gin wheel for > 3rd lift; MAC scored in RAMSMHO 1992 reg 4
Loading exceeded by follow-on tradesAll scaffold usersScafftag (or equiv) with duty rating; handover certificate with kN/m²; weekly inspection signed by competent personWAH 2005 reg 12

UK Regulations & Standards That Apply to System Scaffold

  • Work at Height Regulations 2005 — the foundational duty. Regulation 6 hierarchy applies to the scaffolder erecting just as much as to the trades using the scaffold; weekly inspections under regulation 12 must be by a competent person, recorded.
  • NASC TG20:21 — the industry standard for tube-and-fitting and the compliance benchmark referenced by system manufacturer manuals. Reviewers expect a TG20 compliance sheet (or equivalent system-specific design) attached to the RAMS for any non-standard configuration.
  • NASC SG4:22 — Preventing falls in scaffolding operations — defines safe systems of work for scaffolders erecting and dismantling. The RAMS must reference the advance guard-rail method or, where impractical, the documented justification.
  • CDM 2015 reg 19 — structural integrity duty: any scaffold structure that supports loads or persons must be erected to a design that ensures stability throughout its life.
  • PUWER 1998 — system components are work equipment. They must be suitable, in good repair, and used only by trained operatives.
  • Manufacturer technical guidance — Layher All-Round, HAKI Universal, Cuplok and Kwikstage each publish a User Guide that becomes part of the safe system of work. Cite the manual version number in the RAMS.
  • BS EN 12810 / BS EN 12811 — performance and design requirements for prefabricated facade scaffolds; the standard scaffold designers test against.

System Scaffold — Method Statement Excerpt

Sequence Riskora generates for a typical Layher All-Round independent scaffold to a 4-storey facade with brick guards and debris netting.

  1. Site induction; collect design drawing and ground bearing assessment; verify against TG20:21 / system manual.
  2. Mark out base line; lay continuous sole boards 38 mm thick min on compacted ground.
  3. Set base plates (adjustable jacks) plumb; first lift ledgers fitted into rosettes/cups and wedged.
  4. Erect first lift of standards (max 2.0 m bay, 2.0 m lift); fit ledgers and transoms; level the first lift before continuing.
  5. Install advance guard rail (SG4:22) before any operative steps onto the lift platform.
  6. Pass-up boards and lay; clip-on toeboards; ladder access in dedicated ladder bay with trap.
  7. Place wall ties per pattern (typically every 4 m² with adjustment for sheeted/netted); pull-test 1 in 4 to 6 kN.
  8. Repeat lift sequence; install bracing as designed (facade and ledger braces per system).
  9. Fit debris netting / monoflex sheeting if specified; revise tie pattern accordingly.
  10. Fit brick guards above traffic routes; double guard rail and toeboard at top working lift.
  11. Independent handover inspection by competent person; Scafftag fitted with loading class and date.
  12. Weekly statutory inspection (reg 12 WAH) — record kept on site; re-inspect after high winds / alteration.
  13. Dismantle in reverse sequence — never strip a tie before the lift above is removed; hand-down components.

PPE & Competency Requirements

Minimum PPE on task

  • EN 12492 climbing-style helmet with Y-chinstrap (mandatory for scaffolders per CISRS)
  • EN 361 full-body harness with twin energy-absorbing lanyards (SG4 specification)
  • EN ISO 20345 S3 footwear with mid-foot protection and slip-resistant outsole
  • Cut-resistant gloves (EN 388) for component handling; cold-resistant in winter
  • Hi-vis EN ISO 20471 Class 2 minimum; Class 3 for highway-adjacent work
  • Eye protection (EN 166) during hammering of wedges / pinning

Competency / cards

  • CISRS Scaffolder or Advanced Scaffolder card (system-specific endorsement, e.g. CISRS Systems)
  • System manufacturer training (Layher / HAKI / Cuplok / Kwikstage product course)
  • SG4 awareness — minimum required for any operative working at height during erection
  • CISRS Scaffold Inspection Training Scheme (SITS) for the competent person inspecting
  • First-aider on shift; rescue-from-height drill rehearsed and recorded
  • SSSTS for the supervising charge-hand; SMSTS for the contracts manager on notifiable works

Key Features

  • Task-specific hazard libraries
  • Pre-loaded control measures and method steps
  • Risk matrix with severity and likelihood scoring
  • Professional formatting accepted by principal contractors
  • Version control and document history
  • Download to PDF

Common Questions Before Getting Started

Will this take long?

Under 5 minutes. Select your trade, pick hazards, download.

Is it complicated?

No training needed. The guided builder walks you through every step.

Do I need experience?

If you know what work you're doing, you can use Riskora.

Is it free to try?

Yes. The Free plan needs no card — generate, review and download one free PDF. Upgrade any time for branding, DOCX, sign-off and higher limits.

Create your RAMS in under 5 minutes

No onboarding or setup needed — start generating documents instantly

Try Riskora Free

No card required · 1 free PDF · Upgrade any time (completely free)

Used by contractors and professionalsNo learning curveDocuments ready in minutes
Built for real job scenarios · Used by UK contractors and professionals

All documents generated by Riskora should be reviewed by a competent person before use on site. Riskora provides structured templates — professional judgement is always required.

Inside the document

What your RAMS actually contains

Riskora builds a structured, client-facing document — not a generic AI paragraph. Every section is shaped around your job, your site and your team.

  • Hazards

    Task-specific hazards for the job, captured row by row — not a generic list pulled from an old RAMS.

  • Controls

    Control measures mapped to each hazard with residual risk scoring after controls are applied.

  • PPE

    PPE requirements tied to the activity and site, ready to brief to the team.

  • Method steps

    Step-by-step method statement structured around how the work is actually sequenced on site.

  • Emergency arrangements

    First aid, rescue plan, emergency contacts and site-specific escalation routes.

  • COSHH prompts

    Substance prompts when the work involves chemicals, dusts, fumes or sealants — flagged early, not missed at review.

  • Sign-off

    Operative sign-off captured against the document — names, dates and acknowledgement of the brief.

  • Version history

    Every change tracked so you can show what was issued, when, and which version the team signed.

  • Approval status

    Clear approval state on every document — draft, in review, approved, issued — visible across the team.

  • Audit trail

    Who created it, who reviewed it, who signed it. A complete trail you can hand to a principal contractor or auditor.

Before & after

From copied-and-pasted to site-specific

The reason RAMS get rejected is rarely the format — it's that the document is obviously generic. Riskora rebuilds it around this job, this site and this task.

Before

Generic template copied from an old job.

  • • Hazards and controls that don't match this site or task.
  • • Method steps written for a different sequence of work.
  • • No emergency arrangements specific to the location.
  • • Client flags it as generic and asks for a rewrite.
After

Site-specific document structured around this job, site and task.

  • • Hazards captured from the actual scope you pasted in.
  • • Method steps sequenced for how the work runs on site.
  • • Emergency arrangements and rescue plan tied to the location.
  • • Approved internally, briefed to the team, signed off and stored.
How it works

From job details to signed-off document

A four-step workflow used by contractors, consultants and safety teams to turn informal job details into client-ready safety paperwork.

  1. 1
    Paste job details

    Drop in a client email, a WhatsApp from the site manager, a scope of works or a tender note. Anything that describes the job.

  2. 2
    Riskora structures the document

    Riskora turns your brief into hazards, controls, method steps, PPE, emergency arrangements and COSHH prompts.

  3. 3
    Review, edit and download

    You stay in control of every section. Tweak anything, then download a clean PDF or share a link.

  4. 4
    Brief the team and record sign-off

    Brief operatives, capture their sign-off and keep a full audit trail of who signed which version.

Built for site reality

Built by people who've written this paperwork on real sites

Riskora is built by a founder with hands-on site and document experience — designed for contractors, consultants and safety teams who need to issue, brief and prove safety paperwork without losing a day to admin.

  • Built for contractors, consultants and teams
    Solo trades, principal contractors and in-house safety teams all run on the same workflow.
  • Supports multiple countries
    UK, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, US and Canada — wording and document types match the local standard.
  • Not just documents
    Sign-off, approvals, version history and an audit trail — the management workflow around the paperwork.

Frequently Asked Questions

SG4:22 requires collective fall protection at every working lift, which means advance guard rail (AGR) discipline during both erect and dismantle — operatives must not step onto a lift until the guard rail is in place above them. The RAMS has to name AGR as the primary control, not harness restraint. Harness is mitigation and only acceptable where collective protection is genuinely not reasonably practicable, and the justification must be documented.

TG20:21 compliance sheets cover most standard tube-and-fitting configurations up to 50 m high with standard tie patterns and live load class. Anything outside the compliance envelope — heavy duty above 2.0 kN/m², cantilever, bridged, complex sheeting/netting wind loads, or non-standard system components — needs a bespoke design from a competent designer (typically a Chartered TWC), with the design number cross-referenced on the RAMS cover sheet.

Yes. Riskora generates professional documents in the standard UK format with risk matrices, control measures, and method statements that principal contractors expect.

Yes. Every section is editable. Add, remove, or modify hazards, controls, and method steps to match your specific site conditions.

Ready? It takes less than 5 minutes.

No training. No complex setup. Just select your trade and go.

Start Your RAMS Now — It's Free

No card required · 1 free PDF · Upgrade for branding, DOCX, sign-off and audit trails (completely free)

Already have a RAMS? Upload and rebuild it

References & Further Reading

Primary UK sources covering the legal and practical framework behind RAMS, risk assessments and method statements.

Free RAMS builder

Create your system scaffold uk RAMS free — preview before sign-up

Generate a preview first. Sign up only when you want to save, edit or export.

Final RAMS must be reviewed and approved by a competent person before use.

Riskora is an assistive document preparation tool. All documents generated must be reviewed, verified, and approved by a competent person before use on site. Riskora does not replace professional safety judgment, and no output should be treated as a legal compliance guarantee.